Showing posts with label President Barrack Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Barrack Obama. Show all posts

Friday, July 2, 2010

Facebook | Moroni Holm

Subsidize... I hate the way it is being used by the Government. It makes the Democrat's eye sparkle and the moderate Republican intrigued. It has also been known to turn heads and directions of the so-called conservative Republican. Subsidy is our tax going to the under-productive, only to encourage them to be less productive. Government grows when we allow them to steal from all to give to the Lobbyists employers. Farmers have bad times. We all do... Why are we paying millions to someone just so they don't grow anything? The results of liberal policy have been known to result in the exact opposite of the stated intent.

Facebook | Moroni Holm

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Hollywood decadence revealed by Big Hollywood

"[Left-leaning Hollywood personalities] are uninteresting, they’re vicious, they’re vitriolic, they’re really, really not good people. I’m willing to say that on the record. You could probe them scientifically and anthropologically and prove that they’re not good people....[The Hollywood left] is a stale group of people who are recycling the same old bad ideas that don’t work. Why else would those people go to the stinky side?"
Andrew Breitbart

Corporatism confused with Fascism

Russia and America: Turning the World Upside Down

A little over a year ago, a columnist for the newspaper that once served as the official communications organ of the Central Committee of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) had some choice words for what remains of America’s free market economy.

“Like the breaking of a great dam, the American descent into Marxism is happening with breathtaking speed,” the columnist wrote. “The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama.”

His prediction for the future?

“The proud American will go down into his slavery without a fight, beating his chest and proclaiming to the world how free he really is,” he continued. “The world will only snicker.”

As difficult as it may be to believe, that column appeared last April in Pravda – and a year later its chilling premonition has taken another step towards reality with the passage of Obama’s socialized medicine plan. Meanwhile in the former Soviet Union, things are moving in the opposite direction as health care reforms are currently being proposed with the aim of undoing decades of communist micromanagement.

Has someone turned the world upside down? Is a failed former socialist state really adopting limited free market reforms? And even less fathomable: Is a nation that was conceived in liberty – one that rode the free market to unprecedented wealth creation and an unrivaled standard of living – now adopting the failed ideology of the very nation it vanquished in a global struggle for freedom?

Amazingly, the answer to both questions is “yes.”

According to the Moscow Times, the Russian Duma is currently considering a health care reform bill that “adopts a laissez-faire approach instead of a micromanagement one.” Legislation is also being debated that would force certain hospitals to either start turning a profit or be shut down.

“While Washington plans to pump unprecedented sums into what critics call a government takeover of health care, Moscow is moving in the opposite direction by backing legislation that could force hospitals and other public institutions to go commercial or close,” the Times report notes.
Excerpts from an article By Howard Rich Americans for Limited Government">

Monday, May 3, 2010

Ron Paul accurately deems the terminology for President Obama's political structure

...the President and his defenders can easily deflect that charge(socialist) by pointing out that the historical meaning of socialism is government ownership of industry; under the President's policies, industry remains in nominally private hands. Using the more accurate term -- corporatism -- forces the President to defend his policies that increase government control of private industries and expand de facto subsidies to big businesses. This also promotes the understanding that though the current system may not be pure socialism, neither is it free-market since government controls the private sector through taxes, regulations, and subsidies, and has done so for decades.

Using precise terms can prevent future statists from successfully blaming the inevitable failure of their programs on the remnants of the free market that are still allowed to exist. We must not allow the disastrous results of corporatism to be ascribed incorrectly to free market capitalism or used as a justification for more government expansion. Most importantly, we must learn what freedom really is and educate others on how infringements on our economic liberties caused our economic woes in the first place. Government is the problem; it cannot be the solution.
Socialism vs. Corporatism
By Ron Paul
Published 04/27/10 Campaign for Liberty
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=806

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

We Must Get More Informed

I'm the luckiest man in the world and I understand what that really means. I'm the luckiest man in the world because in the last two or three years, I have been doing my homework and I have been reading things like I've begged you the read The Forgotten Man, Liberal Fascism, the Woodrow Wilson stuff. I know what all of this language means and it is absolutely amazing to me. Negative liberties, that the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. In other words, we're not going to take your guns, we're not going to take your speech. This is what the Progressive movement tried to do under FDR. They want to get rid of those things and tell you what they will do for you. Universal housing, universal health-care, universal jobs. This is a fundamental change. This destroys the work of the founding fathers. This takes us from a small government to an oppressive government.

Glenn Beck October 27, 2008

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Crispus Attucks was a free black man in colonial Boston, Massachusetts. He was protesting the presence of British troops. In 1770 he led a group of unarmed protesters against the soldiers, and they were fired upon. Three were massacred including Attucks. Two others died later due to injuries. Attuck's statesmanlike funeral was attended by thousands. In 1888 in Boston a monument to the Boston Massacre was created.

I ask candidly, why did he give his life for liberty and freedom?

We should stop this racism that is plaguing our nation. It divides us. It seems that those who are making it an issue are those who are politically motivated.

Reverends Wright, Jackson, Sharpton, and others including President Obama, want no opposition while they try to make themselves and their friends powerful and rich. The Democratic Party are being overrun by those who could care less about our country. I believe that Republicans are increasingly shrinking also, because of corruption.

We should seek out the true patriots(black or white or any other race or color) who hate that our nation is being overrun by corruption and tyranny.

Look up Jesse Lee Peterson. Look up Larry Elder. Look up Walter Williams. Look up Alan Keyes. Read about Shelby Steel.

Why should anyone trade their vote for anything? Where is your honor? Would you be willing to protest the powers that be for your liberty and freedom, knowing you may be annihilated?

All that is required now is for us to learn what is happening to our Constitution so that when we become involved in the protests, we are armed with the facts.